2.5M850K1.2M
aboutget startedshop
Daily Rap Facts Logo
DailyRapFacts
newslistsfactsreviews
Subscribe
DailyRapFacts
DailyRapFacts

The world's #1 platform for hip-hop facts, news, and history. Documenting the culture since 2014.

News

  • news
  • lists
  • facts
  • reviews
  • birthdays

Company

  • about
  • get started
  • shop
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise

Stay Updated

Get the latest rap facts and news delivered to your inbox daily.

Join 2M+ fans. Unsubscribe anytime.

© 2025 DailyRapFacts. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceSitemap
Advertisement

Megan Thee Stallion Wins Transfer of Harassment Lawsuit, But Roc Nation Remains a Defendant

Published November 25, 2024 by

n

Megan scores significant legal win

Megan Thee Stallion has moved her harassment lawsuit from California to New York, while the attempt by Roc Nation to be relieved from the indictment was denied.

The case includes claims from Megan’s former photographer Emilio Garcia against the rapper and Roc Nation for various reasons including posing a hostile work environment, harassment, and misclassifying employment status among others.

Last week, there was approval from U.S. District Judge Hernán D. Vera in favor of Megan, allowing her case to proceed in the Southern District of New York; the judge, however, declined to dismiss Roc Nation from the case for the moment.

U.S. District Judge Hernan Vera's ruling says the "forum selection clause" of Emilio Garcia's employment contract as Megan Thee Stallion's photographer is enforceable. https://t.co/RpscqxQQIV pic.twitter.com/AYdsLbRWWm

— Meghann Cuniff (@meghanncuniff) October 7, 2024

Filed in Los Angeles with the California reclassification laws that turn independent contractors into employees, according to maximum hours worked, Garcia’s complaint is joint to Roc Nation’s reasonable inference given the latter’s involvement in the status of the photographer’s work.

"The Court can draw the reasonable inference that Roc Nation, who had the ability to fire Plaintiff and control how Plaintiff was paid, may be considered a joint employer."
The "viewing the complaint in a light most favorable to plaintiff" standard.https://t.co/RpscqxRoyt pic.twitter.com/98DURnhUAn

— Meghann Cuniff (@meghanncuniff) October 7, 2024

Advertisement
Advertisement

More Like This

Related content coming soon...